http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.books?hl=en
rec.arts.books@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* Big Trouble for Bibi - 3 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.books/t/c210bd54e82eb9da?hl=en
* Hannah Arendt's Wrinkled Cunt Rides Again - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.books/t/165ed1cfe37f2566?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Big Trouble for Bibi
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.books/t/c210bd54e82eb9da?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Thurs, Nov 12 2009 5:44 pm
From: "Grand Mal"
"Just Me" <jpdm45@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f8378629-c2ba-4075-97e8-0d6a911ecbcf@37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 12, 6:47 pm, "Koolchi...@smurfsareus.xxx"
<john.kulczy...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> To have to bare you and then have to bare . . .
You figure you got the right "bare" there, K00KChik? Best you should
check that out before you em-bear-ass yourself further. As a person's
command of spelling is a direct reflection of how much time he spends
with books, then surely this will result in his getting more things
than just spelling wrong. Just so, your utterly ignorant position on
Israel loudly proclaims it: you don't know the first part of what
you're always barking about, any more than you know that a mother
*bears* a child, not "bares" it, unless she's changing its diapers.
All you know is what comes into your ears and eyes from ignoramuses
just like you in the tv press, a good many of whom probably can't
spell either.
Swell of you to come in here today bearing the truth about the kind of
bare-ass dummy in diapters it takes to swallow a lot of LibProg
agitprop disinformation about Israel and Palestine, and take the sort
of position you take. Finally! K00Kchiki BARES ALL.
Fucking dimwits on wheels.
--
JM
http://jpdavid.blogspot.com/
http://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
http://vignettes-mackie.blogspot.com/
**************************************************************
Diapters? Do they kind of magnify the crap?
== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Thurs, Nov 12 2009 6:42 pm
From: "Fish Supper"
"Just Me" <jpdm45@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:145a4db9-badd-48af-bb04-9b7fdf24dbb7@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 12, 5:30 pm, "Koolchi...@smurfsareus.xxx"
<john.kulczy...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> On Nov 12, 6:25 pm, Just Me <jpd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 12, 2:24 pm, "Koolchi...@smurfsareus.xxx"
>
> > <john.kulczy...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > > On Nov 12, 1:49 pm, Just Me <jpd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I am not Jewish, but I would happily don a bright blue Magen David
> > > > and
> > > > wear it proudly while I went about the business of feeding a Fish
> > > > Dinner like you to the fishes--to the Christians, for whom the Fish
> > > > is
> > > > their sacred symbol; let them take you out to a dinner of Christ's
> > > > blood, lay hands on you, and pray over you, till the demons come
> > > > blowing out your ass in a big green plume; all this antisemitic pro-
> > > > Palestinian spew, to be finally seen by you for what it really is.
> > > > Nothing but a bunch of toxic fart gas that somehow got re-channeled
> > > > to
> > > > your throat from your ass.
> > > > --
> > > > JMhttp://whosenose.blogspot.comhttp://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
>
> > >http://www.usifaz.com/Web%20Site%20Pics/Screws/forged%20wing%20nut%20...
>
> > There he is -- K0OKchik in his brass Mickey Mouse Club cap. Kinda
> > cute!
> > --
> > JMhttp://whosenose.blogspot.comhttp://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
>
> "I am not Jewish"
>
> So you're a pozer then.
Pozer schmozer. Now you pretend not to know that having a Jewish
father does not make a person Jewish? You know that, you've long
known that. My mother was a Scot. Sadly, I don't qualify.
***
your mother was a scot?
For the first time I'm ashamed of my nationality - how could one of us
produce one of you?
== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Thurs, Nov 12 2009 6:46 pm
From: "Fish Supper"
"Koolchicki@smurfsareus.xxx" <john.kulczycki@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:51b8c813-7746-4004-b6f7-bca0e929b09c@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 12, 8:14 pm, Just Me <jpd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 12, 6:47 pm, "Koolchi...@smurfsareus.xxx"
>
> <john.kulczy...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > To have to bare you and then have to bare . . .
>
> You figure you got the right "bare" there, K00KChik? Best you should
> check that out before you em-bear-ass yourself further. As a person's
> command of spelling is a direct reflection of how much time he spends
> with books, then surely this will result in his getting more things
> than just spelling wrong. Just so, your utterly ignorant position on
> Israel loudly proclaims it: you don't know the first part of what
> you're always barking about, any more than you know that a mother
> *bears* a child, not "bares" it, unless she's changing its diapers.
> All you know is what comes into your ears and eyes from ignoramuses
> just like you in the tv press, a good many of whom probably can't
> spell either.
>
> Swell of you to come in here today bearing the truth about the kind of
> bare-ass dummy in diapters it takes to swallow a lot of LibProg
> agitprop disinformation about Israel and Palestine, and take the sort
> of position you take. Finally! K00Kchiki BARES ALL.
>
> Fucking dimwits on wheels.
> --
> JMhttp://jpdavid.blogspot.com/http://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.comhttp://vignettes-mackie.blogspot.com/
Well if that's the case, I suppose the criteria is that way because
only your mother would know who really was your father.
I've never said Jews were stupid.
Your poor mother.
To have to bear you and then have to bear the guilt that you've heaped
upon her for not making you a Jew.
****
I have no sympathy for the woman - she had the chance to stay in Scotland
and produce a decent human being. Instead, she blew it, and look what we've
been left with. I feel kinda sorry for JM; he's a twat of limited
intelligence and no humanity - but his mother had the chance that her
birthright gave her and should have known better.
Hell mend her and God forgive her for what she's left us with.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Hannah Arendt's Wrinkled Cunt Rides Again
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.books/t/165ed1cfe37f2566?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Thurs, Nov 12 2009 6:46 pm
From: Stratum101
On Nov 12, 1:37 pm, Just Me <jpd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 11, 10:24 pm, Stratum101 <j.coll...@cross-comp.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 11, 2:27 pm, Just Me <jpd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > How's this for a show of optimism, eh? I duly repost these comments
> > > on the slim to nothing chance that maybe by now (present boring
> > > coterie of total squares excluded), some rare to be found soul has
> > > come in to sit down and raise his cup, who would be hip to what's so
> > > hilarious about all this . . .
>
> > > On Nov 3, 3:37 am, Michael Zeleny <larva...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Howard M. Kaminsky writes in a letter to the TLS regarding
> > > > Bernard Wasserstein's Commentary on Hannah Arendt:
> > > > As for his charges relating to Arendt's use of Nazi authors and her
> > > > inadequate love of the Jewish people, I admit, Jew that I am, to
> > > > believing that some Nazi authors had important things to say not
> > > > unrelated to their Nazism, above all the viciously anti-Semitic but
> > > > incomparably brilliant Carl Schmitt (whom Arendt used even more than
> > > > she says) . . .
>
> > > And just think of the way she used Heidegger, and of the way
> > > Heidegger
> > > used her, and of the way Heidegger used other Jews.
>
> > Yes, but Zeleny, tragic character that he is with an
> > imperfect command of English, apparently meant to
> > write "...had important things to say *not related* to
> > their Nazi[i]sm...", the opposite of his clumsy double
> > negative. I don't disagree with him. Intellectuals
> > who bought into the Third Reich were consumed
> > by their Naziism.
>
> Well, I don't know. Seems to me he's always taken a lot of damned
> near obsessive care as to the construction of his texts. So just for
> the hell of it, taking his word for it, what do you suppose would be
> the meaning of his words in case they are to be taken literally? That
> like, antisemitic texts might have "important things to say not
> unrelated to their Nazism"?
He commented that a few Nazis, despite their ideology,
might have had something to say. (Bless their hearts.
"There's a little good in all of us.") It only scans if his
original sentence has one negative.
I don't probe his stuff with a magnifying glass. Never
mind the misogyny. His errors are glaring for me. I
don't refer to syntactical errors necessarily, but
conceptual errors and stylistics that don't conform to
standard English. He used to have an awful habit of
converting any grammatical object to an adverb by
adding -ly. Georgely (or "By George"), that doesn't work
in an analytic language like English where only adjectives
can be promoted to adverbs, and then not when an alternate
adverb already exists, like good / well (but "bad / badly").
The word "goodly" is actually an adjective.
Hmm. "The Queen acted antidisestablishmentarianistically.
'We should keep the C of E for the tax revenue it generates,'
she declared. A Labour Party spokesman who declined
to be identified said it was "hardly any secret that the
royals, the lot of them, are Tories," adding
"We pay her 4 million quid per annum not to have
opinions and I think we ought to demand our money's
worth."
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.arts.books"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.books?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.arts.books+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.books/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en
Has laoreet percipitur ad. Vide interesset in mei, no his legimus verterem. Et nostrum imperdiet appellantur usu, mnesarchum referrentur id vim.
0 comments:
Post a Comment